I'm guessing this may clear out a few social media friends on both sides of the argument. First and foremost, I truly believe the current American political system in place doesn't give two hoots about the life of any citizen, much less the preborn. The fact that abortion has been a hot button issue for every election cycle for years, tells me the politicians aren't going to change anything, except to further divide the people. The timing of this argument raised my curiosity though, as it's not yet the campaign cycle.
Abortion has been legal for nearly 50 years. Nobody is going to stop having sex because some politician does some posturing or some "old lady" blogs about it! I am not for abortion, but I'm not anti-choice. See how crazy the wording on this subject can get? I believe the choice about pregnancy should be made before the chance for conception. If you don't choose to be pregnant, don't do what it takes to get that way! I don't believe in America's health care system at all. I believe pharmaceuticals are sorcery and abortion is part of America's health care system. People from both sides of the political aisle find something to disagree with me on this subject. There are plenty of religious conservatives who will "boycott" at the drop of a hat, until it comes to health care. If abortion is part of health care, why aren't these religious conservatives boycotting and trusting the G-d of the Bible for their health. That's what I'm doing, and I get plenty of grief from that group for my decision, but I digress. Not to leave out the progressive liberals, who seem to want free health care. It was actually the pro-life nitpicking and the pro-choice hate that motivated me to truly reconsider my perspective.
Now, hang on, because I've begun to look at this from an eternal perspective. I made a social media post on the subject of abortion, and the thread took on a life of its own. As I read the comments, and the hate that was spewed and the ridiculous accusations and individual cases of victimization, I was appalled. People get so ugly when they feel strongly about this issue, and once the ugly starts, the tone overrides the content of the statement. As the thread devolved, the strangest thing came to mind, though, and that's what I'm blogging about today.
First, I thought of Abraham. Ishmael was certainly not a part in the perfect plan. All things considered with Islam, just where would this world be right now, if Ishmael had not been born?
Second, I thought of Pharaoh and Herod, while Nebuchadnezzar brushed the edges of that thought. Pharaoh and Herod had no problem declaring death sentences for babies. Nebuchadnezzar was king of Babylon and he designed some pretty harsh punishments for those who were not of Babylon. Considering these three men were all about power and control with little consideration for life that didn't bow down to their power and control. Both sides of the argument lost me there, as American politics is all about power and control. I'm just passing through this world.
Scripture speaks of children being sacrificed to Molech. Molech was a king who received infant sacrifice. Molech has always seemed to me to be a metaphor for self-serving convenience, and that's where my thoughts really began to scramble. In that thread, I read comments made by young women looking forward to the deaths of "older people." When I thought about what some parents and grandparents sacrificed for people this age, I realized there is a serious issue of self-centeredness, and perhaps as Paul mentioned seared conscience or reprobate minds. We older generations didn't do a very good job!
We truly are living in the last days. If these people can look at other people and make statements of waiting for them to die, no wonder they want to maintain the right to kill someone they haven't seen. I couldn't imagine being a helpless baby at their mercy . . . I can't realistically offer to raise and care for all the unwanted babies. I wish I could, but I can't.
Those thoughts were troubling. I know, several G-d fearing people think an unplanned pregnancy should "end" in adoption. We all know that's not going to happen very often and when it does, the government is right in the middle of that, also. In a perfect world, perhaps adoption would be chosen every time, but in a perfect world, there'd be no unplanned pregnancy.
Realizing how much I value choice and how many people just really want to make decisions for other people, I've realized I don't want to make decisions for other adults and I don't want them making decisions for me. I also realized in some of those pro-choice comments, I wouldn't want them to have a baby! Still, though, it's not my decision. The rhetoric and brainwashing is intense. Calling a developing human a zygote or embryo, or even fetus; somehow removes the "human" factor for some individuals. Conscience cannot be legislated! I've read about the cases of rape and incest, but anyone with Google can find the actual abortion statistics on that and realize it's a very, very small percentage of the abortions that are performed.
I had two other thoughts that seem oddly comforting. Our Heavenly Father, whom many do not serve or honor promised Abraham heirs too numerous to count. In describing the number, He compared them to the stars and sand . . . We've watched the decline of morals and the rebellion against our Creator gain momentum. Every aborted child will not be raised by self-serving hedonists or religious hypocrites. I know hearts can change. I'm certainly not the person I was in my twenties, and for that I'm terribly thankful. Would I ever counsel someone to have an abortion? No! But by that same token, I think it's much better for those babies to be amidst the white robed throngs than raised by someone that doesn't want them and doesn't care about the value of their soul.
That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed
as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy
seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; Torah of Holy Scripture
This site considers topics in the news, from an independent, a-political view.
Showing posts with label choice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label choice. Show all posts
Monday, May 20, 2019
Tuesday, November 08, 2016
The Election
I'm not presenting "just the facts," but rather introducing possible supposition, as we cannot possibly know the outcome until we've lived through it or . . . not. I do believe the choices for this election don't seem like much of a choice! Let's look at what "we the people" have been asking for, for years now.
We are tired of career politicians that owe their election to the Big Corporate lobby. They are owned and we already know their bills, votes, and ultimate legislation are based upon campaign funding and the size of donations. Simply stated: "Money talks." So we've cried out for new names and fresh faces. In 2008, we got "little known" Barack Obama. Obviously, he was more well connected than any president before him, in that he is completely protected from questions and above any accountability. He's had a peculiar way of force feeding Americans what they don't want, even many who voted for him . . .
Hillary, on the other hand, is quite well connected, or rather, her name is well known in political circles as well as Big Corporate America. She's clearly in the upper echelon of The One Percent, while somehow condemning elitist and white privilege. I honestly do not know how her fans keep listening, but according to the polls, whether or not they are listening, they are supportive. Her crowds do seem a bit disorganized, photoshopped, or just disoriented, but, that's a topic for another blog . . .
Donald Trump is the antithesis of career politician, and he has his own bankroll, so he apparently cannot be bought, which brings us to an entirely different problem that has not been an issue with career politicians and those who are "lobby owned." In American politics, there is a certain entailment of accountability to those who have written large checks toward the campaign. If Donald Trump cannot be bought and owned, will he be accountable? I never watched his reality show, but I did see a trailer, in which I thought he was a pompous @$$. Yes, I know I was judging him on very limited information, so I've repented. There are a number of reports regarding his humanitarianism long before he was running for office, and I do admire the fact that he has used his wealth to bless others! As for him being presidential material, he is a CEO; whereas his opponent wasn't even a homeowner until 2000.
I have a couple of theories about the outcome of the coming election, but this much I do know. The voters and the non-voters are vehemently divided; and the voters are not mincing words about how they feel toward the non-voters. It's interesting to see for many, their political view is as dogmatic as their religious perspective . . . yet I digress. The potential outcome of this election could have a reaction in the streets, long before a January inauguration. Changes in the cities could come very quickly.
If Hillary is elected, a large portion of the conservative city dwellers may "head for the hills." Many of Hillary's fans don't seem to realize the number of cities and towns that are already well on their way to looking like Detroit, MI. America really doesn't make anything, anymore, but fast food. We can see from history, as the social programs in this country have increased, manufacturing has diminished. The only job security is in health care and government. If a community is large enough to have a police and fire department, a social service office, and their own water treatment system, the city and or county is a major source of employment. Add a hospital, home health agency, and a couple of nursing homes and it becomes quite clear, that health care is also a major source of employment . . . Much of health care is already government controlled and we know Hillary has had her site set on government controlled health care, since Bill was in the White House.
If Donald is elected, I would not be surprised to see "rioting" in the streets, but the current administration will call it protesting . . . I am not sure a Trump presidency will postpone the implementation toward martial law, at all, considering the current administration will still have two and a half months of power after the election.
As for the coming election, I'm afraid America is going to get what we deserve . . .
. . . behold, ye have sinned against YHWH: and be sure your sin will find you out. Torah of Holy Scripture
We are tired of career politicians that owe their election to the Big Corporate lobby. They are owned and we already know their bills, votes, and ultimate legislation are based upon campaign funding and the size of donations. Simply stated: "Money talks." So we've cried out for new names and fresh faces. In 2008, we got "little known" Barack Obama. Obviously, he was more well connected than any president before him, in that he is completely protected from questions and above any accountability. He's had a peculiar way of force feeding Americans what they don't want, even many who voted for him . . .
Hillary, on the other hand, is quite well connected, or rather, her name is well known in political circles as well as Big Corporate America. She's clearly in the upper echelon of The One Percent, while somehow condemning elitist and white privilege. I honestly do not know how her fans keep listening, but according to the polls, whether or not they are listening, they are supportive. Her crowds do seem a bit disorganized, photoshopped, or just disoriented, but, that's a topic for another blog . . .
Donald Trump is the antithesis of career politician, and he has his own bankroll, so he apparently cannot be bought, which brings us to an entirely different problem that has not been an issue with career politicians and those who are "lobby owned." In American politics, there is a certain entailment of accountability to those who have written large checks toward the campaign. If Donald Trump cannot be bought and owned, will he be accountable? I never watched his reality show, but I did see a trailer, in which I thought he was a pompous @$$. Yes, I know I was judging him on very limited information, so I've repented. There are a number of reports regarding his humanitarianism long before he was running for office, and I do admire the fact that he has used his wealth to bless others! As for him being presidential material, he is a CEO; whereas his opponent wasn't even a homeowner until 2000.
I have a couple of theories about the outcome of the coming election, but this much I do know. The voters and the non-voters are vehemently divided; and the voters are not mincing words about how they feel toward the non-voters. It's interesting to see for many, their political view is as dogmatic as their religious perspective . . . yet I digress. The potential outcome of this election could have a reaction in the streets, long before a January inauguration. Changes in the cities could come very quickly.
If Hillary is elected, a large portion of the conservative city dwellers may "head for the hills." Many of Hillary's fans don't seem to realize the number of cities and towns that are already well on their way to looking like Detroit, MI. America really doesn't make anything, anymore, but fast food. We can see from history, as the social programs in this country have increased, manufacturing has diminished. The only job security is in health care and government. If a community is large enough to have a police and fire department, a social service office, and their own water treatment system, the city and or county is a major source of employment. Add a hospital, home health agency, and a couple of nursing homes and it becomes quite clear, that health care is also a major source of employment . . . Much of health care is already government controlled and we know Hillary has had her site set on government controlled health care, since Bill was in the White House.
If Donald is elected, I would not be surprised to see "rioting" in the streets, but the current administration will call it protesting . . . I am not sure a Trump presidency will postpone the implementation toward martial law, at all, considering the current administration will still have two and a half months of power after the election.
As for the coming election, I'm afraid America is going to get what we deserve . . .
. . . behold, ye have sinned against YHWH: and be sure your sin will find you out. Torah of Holy Scripture
Sunday, December 14, 2014
Choices
I used to say, "I'm all about choice," until I found myself in a relationship with an individual who offers "no choice." There are no words for the thoughts and feelings that slammed my brain like a tsunami, as that man would stand, half shrugging his shoulders, while saying, "What can I do?" For some; choice seems to be just too much personal responsibility. This has given me a great opportunity to think and observe what our society has lost because people no longer make choices, thus lack commitment. It's as if we just go through life adding 10 or 20 percent of this or that to our already half full, half stacked wagon of baggage. Relationships are based upon the acceptance of past baggage rather than building a future. Of course, everyone has a past, but most folks now, drag it into their present. I'm not talking about children from a previous relationship, most baggage draggers just use their kids as a cover to maintain control, or keep the drama stirred. What I've noticed through a few generations now, of being all about choice, is the transition that has taken place, as each generation ricochets off the standard and example of the last one. I still believe in choice, I'm just careful who I say it to! My land radio show was entitled "Choose Life."
Some people take full responsibility for their choices, even for their not so responsible choices. Many of the men of my father's generation made quite a comfortable living, acquired and amassed with a high school education, OJT, and determination toward their committed choices. Regardless of how they came into adulthood, they made clear and concise choices to go forward, accomplish, acquire, and amass. They made choices and they were committed to those choices. When things didn't work out, they picked up the pieces and made the choice to rebuild. Of course, there were exceptions, but that was the rule of the generation that arrived before WWII. There are those who still make clear and concise choices and "pay the fiddler" as they go, but they are clearly no longer mainstream. Our society no longer insists that anyone make clear choices, as a matter of fact, commitment to any long term choice usually now comes at a cost to the parents or society in general.
My generation, yes the boomers, we did a great deal to transition from the choice of lifelong commitment, to we'll see how this goes . . . Our generation was the first to openly cohabitate, yet also caused the divorce rate to skyrocket. Obviously that statistical equation has some unnamed variables! For the most part, we had a little more education than high school and careers were extremely important, but we women followed the examples set years earlier by the "Rosie the Riveters" and made the choice to have it all. Rosie the Riveters were married to men who were committed to them, feminists, unfortunately, were not! Relationships failed and the men maintained their careers and their responsibilities, but most dragged their last relationship into the next relationship. So, as men thought they could have a new start while still keeping an ex happy, the exes continued to dominate two households while moving on socially, and the new women determined careers and kids would come before men. Although we may have grown up in secret dysfunction, the boomers openly made dysfunctional, the standard. Choice was no longer applied to direction and building of acquiring and amassing, but rather to escape and "new" beginnings became mired with accumulated baggage. Rather than making and sticking with a choice for life, choice became redefined to "finding ourselves."
While we boomers spent our twenties and part of our thirties, choosing to find ourselves, only to discover we weren't so thrilled with who we found ourselves to be, also discovered our kid's formative years were over. In the starting over with accumulated baggage, our kids did seem to make one choice and that was to just start later . . . and of course, test the waters before even considering a commitment, if at all. So many programs were afforded to single mothers going to school and live in boyfriends no longer interfered with state "benefits." Marriage would only rob a young woman of assistance and a young man of, well . . .being a man. Besides, a divorced baby boomer mom, usually had a basement to move back into, or a spare room. So, a couple of babies later, no real commitment, a "place to come home," and life just expands and continues for everyone with no real choices being made. Life just "happened" and babies just "came along."
Now, there is yet another generation. Between ancestral guilt and nearly unlimited borrowing opportunities, this generation can have it all by their early twenties, with minimal accountability of reality. Boys literally do not become men until, well until their mothers stop paying their bills and feeding them. They do often, however; become fathers long before that. Moms are so condoning and cool, girls no longer want their own space. It seems the right of passage for young women these days is motherhood and the right to speak her mind.
Our society seems to have taken the centuries old approach of the family continuing to expand and work together, passing the torch of responsibility with the right of passage, to celebrating a failure to launch. The right of passage to adulthood used to involve a conscious choice of commitment with no turning back and NO "Alternate Plan B." Commitment or consequences used to follow choices. Now, for the most part, our society seems to encourage the choice to not really build a future, but rather just exist, often dependent upon others. Choices are still being made, but they are not choices of forward momentum and aspiration. We are living longer and accomplishing less. We are choosing stagnation, dependence and victimhood, rather than life!
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy children may live: Torah of Holy Scripture
Some people take full responsibility for their choices, even for their not so responsible choices. Many of the men of my father's generation made quite a comfortable living, acquired and amassed with a high school education, OJT, and determination toward their committed choices. Regardless of how they came into adulthood, they made clear and concise choices to go forward, accomplish, acquire, and amass. They made choices and they were committed to those choices. When things didn't work out, they picked up the pieces and made the choice to rebuild. Of course, there were exceptions, but that was the rule of the generation that arrived before WWII. There are those who still make clear and concise choices and "pay the fiddler" as they go, but they are clearly no longer mainstream. Our society no longer insists that anyone make clear choices, as a matter of fact, commitment to any long term choice usually now comes at a cost to the parents or society in general.
My generation, yes the boomers, we did a great deal to transition from the choice of lifelong commitment, to we'll see how this goes . . . Our generation was the first to openly cohabitate, yet also caused the divorce rate to skyrocket. Obviously that statistical equation has some unnamed variables! For the most part, we had a little more education than high school and careers were extremely important, but we women followed the examples set years earlier by the "Rosie the Riveters" and made the choice to have it all. Rosie the Riveters were married to men who were committed to them, feminists, unfortunately, were not! Relationships failed and the men maintained their careers and their responsibilities, but most dragged their last relationship into the next relationship. So, as men thought they could have a new start while still keeping an ex happy, the exes continued to dominate two households while moving on socially, and the new women determined careers and kids would come before men. Although we may have grown up in secret dysfunction, the boomers openly made dysfunctional, the standard. Choice was no longer applied to direction and building of acquiring and amassing, but rather to escape and "new" beginnings became mired with accumulated baggage. Rather than making and sticking with a choice for life, choice became redefined to "finding ourselves."
While we boomers spent our twenties and part of our thirties, choosing to find ourselves, only to discover we weren't so thrilled with who we found ourselves to be, also discovered our kid's formative years were over. In the starting over with accumulated baggage, our kids did seem to make one choice and that was to just start later . . . and of course, test the waters before even considering a commitment, if at all. So many programs were afforded to single mothers going to school and live in boyfriends no longer interfered with state "benefits." Marriage would only rob a young woman of assistance and a young man of, well . . .being a man. Besides, a divorced baby boomer mom, usually had a basement to move back into, or a spare room. So, a couple of babies later, no real commitment, a "place to come home," and life just expands and continues for everyone with no real choices being made. Life just "happened" and babies just "came along."
Now, there is yet another generation. Between ancestral guilt and nearly unlimited borrowing opportunities, this generation can have it all by their early twenties, with minimal accountability of reality. Boys literally do not become men until, well until their mothers stop paying their bills and feeding them. They do often, however; become fathers long before that. Moms are so condoning and cool, girls no longer want their own space. It seems the right of passage for young women these days is motherhood and the right to speak her mind.
Our society seems to have taken the centuries old approach of the family continuing to expand and work together, passing the torch of responsibility with the right of passage, to celebrating a failure to launch. The right of passage to adulthood used to involve a conscious choice of commitment with no turning back and NO "Alternate Plan B." Commitment or consequences used to follow choices. Now, for the most part, our society seems to encourage the choice to not really build a future, but rather just exist, often dependent upon others. Choices are still being made, but they are not choices of forward momentum and aspiration. We are living longer and accomplishing less. We are choosing stagnation, dependence and victimhood, rather than life!
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy children may live: Torah of Holy Scripture
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)